Mayo Clinic
researchers and a team of collaborating scientists from across the country have
determined the comparative effectiveness of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs (NSAIDs), aspirin and several supplements in preventing the recurrence of
advanced neoplasia (polyps that are the precursor of colorectal cancer) after
polyp removal.
According to the World
Cancer Research Fund, colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the
world. In the U.S., more than one-third of people who develop colorectal cancer
will die of the disease, with most of those cancers arising from advanced
neoplasia (also known as advanced adenomas or adenomatous polyps).
In their study, published
this month in The BMJ, the research team showed that, for most
patients, nonaspirin NSAIDs (e.g., ibuprofen) work better than aspirin or a
host of nutritional supplements to prevent the growth of advanced adenomas. In
the paper, they say that due to most colorectal cancers developing from this
type of polyps, preventing them is a good proxy for colorectal cancer
prevention.
"Approximately 85
percent of all colorectal cancers are thought to result from untreated
adenomatous polyps," says M. Hassan Murad, M.D., a clinical epidemiologist
and preventive medicine physician at Mayo Clinic, and the study's senior
author. "If we can find a way to stop their growth, we could prevent a
majority of these cases."
"We knew that aspirin
and other NSAIDs have a protective effect, and that a number of other
nutritional supplements have also been studied for their effectiveness in
preventing cancer," says Dr. Murad. "What we didn't know is how they
compared to each other."
The team conducted a
meta-analysis (a statistical research method that involves combining data from
multiple studies to obtain a single consolidated observation) of clinical trial
data from 15 randomized control trials, reviewing information from 12,234
patients. These studies included low- and high-dose aspirin therapy, calcium,
vitamin D and folic acid, and compared them each alone or in various
combinations.
Dr. Murad and his
colleagues showed that nonaspirin NSAIDs are better than all the other compared
therapies for preventing recurrence of adenomatous polyps within three to five
years following initial polyp removal. However, because of some of the other
health risks of nonaspirin NSAIDs, they may not be the best choice for
everyone.
Aspirin had nearly as good
of results, with much less additional risk. Dr. Murad and his colleagues cautioned
that, although low-dose aspirin was ranked second in preventive capabilities,
"the excess benefit over risk might therefore be favorable for many
patients."
"It is important that
patients and doctors have a discussion on the various risks and benefits of any
medication or other therapy," says Dr. Murad. "While a research
publication may contain promising findings, it is generalized information, and
each individual is different. So their care will be individualized, as
well."
No comments:
Post a Comment