Men with a high fitness level in midlife
appear to be at lower risk for lung and colorectal cancer, but not prostate
cancer, and that higher fitness level also may put them at lower risk of death
if they are diagnosed with cancer when they're older, according to a study
published online by JAMA Oncology.
While the association between
cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been
well-established, the value of CRF as a predictor of primary cancer has gotten
less attention, according to background in the study.
Susan G. Lakoski, M.D., M.S., of the
University of Vermont, Burlington, and coauthors looked at the association
between midlife CRF and incident cancer and survival following a cancer
diagnosis at the Medicare age of 65 or older. The study included 13,949 men who
had a baseline fitness exam where CRF was assessed in a treadmill test. Fitness
levels were assessed between 1971 and 2009 and lung, prostate and colorectal
cancers were assessed using Medicare data from 1999 to 2009.
During an average 6.5 years of
surveillance for the 13,949 men, 1,310 of them were diagnosed with prostate
cancer, 200 with lung cancer and 181 men with colorectal cancer.
The authors found that high CRF in midlife
was associated with a 55 percent lower risk of lung cancer and a 44 percent
lower risk of colorectal cancer compared to men with low CRF. However this same
association was not seen between midlife CRF and prostate cancer, and authors
note the exact reasons for this are unknown, although they speculate men with
high CRF may be more prone to undergo preventive screenings and therefore have
a greater opportunity to be diagnosed with prostate cancer.
The study also found that high CRF in
midlife was associated with a 32 percent lower risk for cancer death among men
who developed lung, colorectal or prostate cancer at Medicare age compared with
men with low CRF. And, high CRF in midlife was associated with a 68 percent
reduction in CVD death compared with low CRF among men who developed cancer.
No comments:
Post a Comment